Snapdragon 865 vs Other Existing Flagship, Which one is the Best For you 10

Snapdragon 865 vs Other Existing Flagship, Which one is the Best For you

This post will be a detailed Comparison of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 990, Samsung Exynos 990, Mediatek Dimensity 1000 and Apple A13 Bionic

If you want a comparison between the Snapdragon 865, snapdragon 855/855+ and Snapdragon 845 then follow this link

First Lets start with the Specification table

Snapdragon 865 vs Existing Flagships Specification table

SpecificationSnapdragon 865Exynos 990Kirin 990 5GDimensity 1000A13 Bionic
CPU High-Performance core 1X Kryo 585 Gold @2.84 GHz, 3x Kryo 585 Gold @2.4 GHz and 4 Efficiency Cores 4x Kryo 585 Silver @1.8 GHz
(Cortex A77/A55)
Dual-core (M 5th gen) +
Dual-core (Cortex-A76) +
Quad-core (Cortex-A55)
2x Cortex-A76 @ 2.86 GHz
2x Cortex-A76 @ 2.36 GHz
4x Cortex-A55 @ 1.95 GHz
4X High-Performance Cortex A-77 clocked at 2.6 GHz, and 4X High-Efficiency Cortex A-55 Clocked at 2.0 GHz 2X High-performance Lightning cores @2.65 GHz, 4X energy-efficient Thunder Cores
GPUAdreno 650 Mali-G77 MP11 Mali-G76 MP16 Arm Mali-G77 Apple 4 Core GPU
AIQualcomm Hexagon 698 Dual-core NPU Da Vinci NPU MediaTek APU 3.0 AMX blocks
Display4K [email protected] FPS
[email protected]
HDR10, HDR10+
WUXGA (3840×2400),
4K UHD (4096×2160)
No InformationFHD+ @120Hz and 2K+ up to 90Hz. 1242 x 2688 pixels
Dolby Vision
ISP/CameraUp to 25 MP, Dual Camera, ZSL, 30fps
Up to 64 MP, Single Camera, MFNR, ZSL, 30fps
Single Camera: Up to 200 MP
Slow Motion Video:
720p @ 960 FPS
Dolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+, HEVC
Single-camera 108MP
Dual-camera 24.8MP+24.8MP
64MP First 5 core ISP with 3 big and 2 small design capable of up to 80 MP on a single camera at 24 frames per second and up to 32+16MP on dual camera, 12 MP
Video8K @ 30fps
4K UHD @ 120fps
720p @ 960fps
8K 30fps or 4K UHD 120fps4K UHD @ 60fps 3840 x 2160P [email protected]/30/60fps
MemoryLPDDR5 (4X16bit) @ 2750 MHz LPDDR5 LPDDR4-4266 16 GB of LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X55 5G modem-RF system(5G Download/Upload: 7.4Gbps/3Gbps) Exynos Modem 5123
7350 Mbps down
Balong 5000
4G / 5G (integrated)
2300 Mbps down
1250 Mbps up
Helio M70 5G Modem 4.7Gbps downlink and 2.5Gbps uplink speeds LTE
ConnectivityWifi 6
Bluetooth 5.1
Wifi 6
Bluetooth 5.0
Wifi 6
Bluetooth 5.0
Wifi 6
Bluetooth 5.1
Wifi 6
Bluetooth 5.0
Manufacturing Process7nm EUV7nm EUV7nm+ EUV7nm7nm +

Specification details:


CPU Wise, from Geekbench 4.4 Results the Apple A13 Bionic Is the Strongest with the Snapdragon 865 Coming very close to it and may even defeat it in its real performance(Benchmarks for Snapdragon 865 are test benchmarks and Will surely increase by the time consumers series come). Dimensity 1000 being at third position and the Kirin 990 is the weakest of all,
the benchmarks for Exynos 990 is still not available yet.
But one thing is sure that all the above processors are stronger than the Previous Year’s Snapdragon 855+

In Antutu Benchmarks
The Snapdragon 865 – 568,191(highest for any consumer Smartphone till now)
The A13 Bionic comes second in the race with a score of 549,717
Then comes Dimenstiy 1000 with a score of 511,363
Then Kirin 990 5G with a score of 457,357
The Antutu Score for Exynos 990 is still not available

But these results can be different in real life performance as these are from Geekbench which, only test’s the CPU, not the whole smartphone, and the amount of RAM, RAM frequency, Type of Storage used can seriously affect the device performance.


GPU wise The Snapdragon 865 seems to be the winner with features like,
QHD+ @144 Hz, Snapdragon elite gaming features, Desktop Forward Rendering, and updatable GPU drives.
The A13 bionic is very close to it with its Quad-Core GPU.
The Diminsity 1000 and Exynos 990 are also not far behind, as the mali G-77 is a great GPU.
The kirin 990 is using the Mali G-76 GPU the oldest of all.


The Qualcomm Hexagon 698 can performance Up to 15 TOPS(Trillions of operation per second)
Mediatek APU 3.0 Up to 4.5 TOPS
Dual-Core NPU 10 TOPS
No Information on Kirin 990
A13 Bionic Up to one trillion 8-bit operations per second


Display-wise Qualcomm is the winner as it supports QHD+ Resolution at 144Hz then MediaTek and Samsung as they support FHD+ resolution at 120 HZ


The A13 Bionic is out of the options here as it doesn’t have any type of 5G support but for LTE it can have Up to 1.2 Gbps Downlink speed.

The Exynos 990 can have Up to 7.35Gbps in mmWave and 5.1Gbps in the sub-6GHz setting in 4G LTE mode, it supports up to 3Gbps of downlink speed and up to 422Mbps of uplink speed.

The kirin 990 can have In Sub-6GHz band, the theoretical peak download speed can reach 2.3 Gbps and the theoretical peak upload speed can reach 1.25 Gbps.

The Dimensity 1000 up to 4.7Gbps downlink and 2.5Gbps uplink speeds over the sub-6GHz network.

The Snapdragon 865 up to 5G Download/Upload: 7.4Gbps/3Gbps.
Theoretically, the snapdragon 865 is the winner here, but it doesn’t have an integrated 5G Modem,
if we take Integrated 5G modem into account then Dimensity 1000 is the winner


A13 Bionic is ahead of the Snapdragon 865 by a very small margin and the difference between the Dimensity 1000 and snapdragon 865 is also not by much
but these are test benchmarks and the real data from smartphones may vary

Geekbench 4.4

Snapdragon 865 vs Other Existing Flagship, Which one is the Best For you 11

Antutu V8

Here Clearly the Snapdragon 865 is the winner with A13 bionic getting close to it and the kirin 990 is the last

Snapdragon 865 vs Other Existing Flagship, Which one is the Best For you 15


In Raw CPU performance, the A13 Bionic Is the Winner for now but can be defeated by the Snapdragon 865 if some tweaks are made here and there and Dimensity 1000 is also very close to it
Benchmarks for Exynos 990 are not here so no comments there and Kirin 990 is the Weakest in terms of Raw CPU performance

Overall The Snapdragon 865 Seems to be the Winner here as It is having an Overall Package, with being the Best in many Division’s

5 thoughts on “Snapdragon 865 vs Other Existing Flagship, Which one is the Best For you

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Powered by Free CDN WordPress plugin Protection Status